Universities, hospitals and municipal buildings face a version of the energy problem that is exceptionally hard to solve: infrastructure from different decades, timetables that change every semester and growing accountability for results — while every significant change has to go through public procurement.
Expectations are rising. Public institutions are increasingly held to sustainability targets and to the same disclosure standards as the private sector, and their results are public.
What is needed is a way to improve the efficiency of the buildings and systems already in place, demonstrate the result with credible data, and on that basis decide where to invest next.
BMS, meters and controllers from different decades and different manufacturers. Replacement is expensive, and in a school or a hospital disruption is no small matter.
The academic calendar, the timetable, opening hours, wards of varying intensity. A static system picks the wasteful option because it is the safe one.
Every significant upgrade goes through public procurement: specification, tender, appeals. Quarters pass between the decision and the effect.
It is the ageing systems these buildings are fitted with that are usually responsible for the waste. They run on crude schedules or are operated by hand, with no real optimisation at all.
On top of that, a local authority managing dozens or hundreds of buildings rarely has the visibility to establish which of them perform worst. Without that, every decision about the order of works rests on guesswork.
The cheapest efficiency improvement is the one that needs no new equipment.
Percee® lays a layer of optimisation and control over the installations already working in the building. That is usually the cheapest available way to improve its performance — and a starting point, not a substitute for investment.
How energy cost optimisation works →Percee® does not replace investment and does not claim it is unnecessary. It changes its order and its aim. The institution first extracts what control alone can deliver, and then — with continuous measurement of consumption broken down by building, circuit and utility — knows which building, which installation and what scope of work will actually pay back. The capital that is spent lands where the measurement pointed.
In the public sector this has one further consequence. Every significant upgrade goes through public procurement, and quarters pass between the decision and the effect. Measurement data feeds the specification and the justification of the expenditure, so the tender rests on measured consumption rather than an estimate from an audit made years ago. And while the procedure runs, the buildings are already saving — the optimisation layer does not wait for a tender to be decided.
Works with the whole mixture of manufacturers and vintages a public estate usually contains.
Percee® integrates with older BMS systems, meters and controllers — including those that lost manufacturer support long ago. It requires no removals, creates no dependence on a single supplier and closes no doors to future upgrades.
A university runs on the academic calendar — terms, exam periods, holidays, long summer breaks — and within it on a timetable that fills and empties rooms hour by hour.
Heating an empty lecture hall through an entire term break is pure waste — repeated across the whole campus.
Percee® integrates with academic calendars and timetables: lecture halls are brought up to conditions before a class and shut down when empty. Rooms respond to their actual timetable, not to one schedule imposed from above.
The same principle covers every public building — a hospital running without interruption but with wards of very different intensity, and an office with its own rhythm of opening hours, events and closures. Predictive control adds the weather forecast, and where data from access control, room booking or presence sensors is available, the system matches the plant to actual occupancy rather than to assumptions.
This is where a city or a large university gains real control. Percee® manages many buildings as one system: it compares them against one another, automatically flags the worst performers and makes it possible to direct funds where they will have the greatest effect.
What works in the best-run building can be carried across to the rest. And when a building shows an unusual consumption pattern, the team gets an immediate alert — often catching a fault before it becomes a breakdown or a comfort complaint. Emergency repairs are among the most expensive, so catching a fault early has measurable value.
Dozens of buildings — and rarely any visibility into which of them performs worst.
Beyond scheduling, percee® lowers cost by managing energy in relation to the market:
Every unit of energy not consumed is at once a lower bill and a smaller carbon footprint against the institution's environmental targets.
Public institutions increasingly have to demonstrate environmental results, not merely declare them. Percee® records consumption continuously, broken down by building, circuit and energy carrier.
Verified data, not estimates, for:
Reporting becomes a continuous by-product of managing the estate well, rather than an annual scramble for data.
| What typical automation assumes | The public sector reality | |
|---|---|---|
| Building | one, modern | a mix of old and new, different manufacturers |
| Schedule | fixed | terms, exam periods, breaks, opening hours |
| Road to change | an internal decision | public procurement, quarters |
| Proof of result | internal | public, open to scrutiny |
| Reach | one facility | dozens or hundreds of buildings |
No. Percee® is a layer of optimisation over what is already installed, and it integrates with older BMS systems, meters and controllers. It is usually the cheapest way to improve a building's performance, and at the same time a first step: measurement from that layer shows where the next investment will genuinely pay back.
Yes — hardware independence is the starting point here, not an extra. A public estate is usually a mixture of vintages and manufacturers, so the system was designed to read state from, and send commands to, whatever is actually installed, without tying the institution to a single supplier.
From integration with the academic calendar and the timetable and, where available, with access control, the room booking system and presence sensors. On that basis a room is brought up to conditions before a class and shut down when it is empty.
Yes, and for many local authorities that is the first real benefit. Automatic benchmarking compares buildings against one another and flags the worst performers, which makes it possible to direct funds where they will have the greatest effect — rather than spreading them evenly.
Deploying an optimisation layer is not a construction project and requires no equipment replacement, so its scope is far simpler to specify than an upgrade of the installations. And when an institution is preparing a tender for such an upgrade, data from continuous measurement feeds the specification and the justification of the expenditure — an estimate is replaced by the measured consumption of a specific building.
Yes. Consumption is recorded continuously, broken down by building, circuit and utility, which provides the basis for ESG and CSRD reporting, ISO 50001 documentation and the public demonstration of results with verified figures rather than estimates.
Spend public money more effectively and meet environmental targets at the same time.
Percee® adds intelligence to the infrastructure already standing in the buildings, follows the real calendar of their use, manages the whole estate from one place and takes automatic action every day. The result is an estate that stops heating empty rooms, catches faults before they become breakdowns and routinely produces data ready for scrutiny. And when the time comes for a larger investment, the measurement shows where to direct it.